The Continued US Violation of Cuban
Sovereignty and Independence: The 102nd Anniversary of the
Platt Amendment
March 2nd, 2004
"The
Government of Cuba consents that the United States may
exercise the right to intervene for the preservation of Cuban
independence".
Thus states Article III of the infamous Platt Amendment
which went into force on March 2nd 1901, 102 years ago,
violating Cuba's nascent independence turning it into a client
state of the USA.
Article VII went on to say that "To enable the United States
to maintain the independence of Cuba, and to protect the
people thereof, as well as for its own defense, the Government
of Cuba will sell or lease to the United States lands
necessary for coaling or naval stations, at certain specified
points, to be agreed upon with the President of the United
States." Hence Guantánamo Bay US Naval Base which the United
States "rents" from Cuba although Havana never cashes the
annual check.
On January 1st, 1899, after almost four centuries of
occupation, the Spanish Crown finally relinquished its
colonial hold on Cuba. The United States, however - which for
its own territorial gains had helped Cuba defeat Madrid -
replaced one colonial power with another. US General John R.
Brooke installed a military government on the island and
completely ignored the important contribution of the Cuban
population - especially the black contingent - in the defeat
of Spain. This was the beginning of the United States
occupation of Cuba.
In 1900, a Constituent Assembly was convened in Cuba which
drafted a constitution that followed the same lines as the US
Constitution but with one very different provider: Washington
conditioned its approval of the Cuban Constitution on the
acceptance of a series of clauses that would preserve its
upper hand in future dealings with so-called "independent"
Cuba. These clauses, which were to be appended to the draft of
the Constitution, were prepared by the United States Secretary
of War and attached to the Arms Appropriation Bill of 1901,
becoming known as the Platt Amendment after their author US
Senator Orville Platt.
In spite of the new constitution, the United States had no
intention of allowing Cuba to go its own way. Way back in
1783, US President John Quincy Adams had called Cuba a natural
extension of North America and as such should be annexed. His
policy was not to help Cuba gain independence because that
could cause sticky problems in the future, but to wait until
the right moment to seize the island from Spain.
Although it took more than 100 years to get its hands on
Cuba, Washington never altered its course as far as the island
was concerned. John Quincy Adams, on his second term as
president, commented in 1823 that "if an apple, severed by the
tempest from its native tree, cannot but fall to the ground,
Cuba, forcibly disjoined from its unnatural connection with
Spain and incapable of self-support, can gravitate only to the
North American union, which by the same law of nature, cannot
cast her off from its bosom."
The Platt Amendment therefore represented a permanent
restriction on Cuban self-determination and was a humiliation
to those who had fought so long and hard for the island's
independence - the United State's government having made it
quite clear that the Platt Amendment was the only alternative
to further military occupation.
With the war against Spain at the end of the 19th century -
a war that Washington and the US mainstream media provoked
after the highly suspicious explosion of the USS Maine in
Havana's harbor - the United States had the opportunity to set
itself up as Cuba's savior. Cuban writer, poet, philosopher,
politician and independence fighter José Martí, however, saw
through the supposed philanthropy, and, ever the Latin
American that he was, commented that he sought "to prevent the
United States, with the independence of Cuba, extending itself
through the West Indies and falling with added weight upon our
lands of America" and that he had lived "within the entrails
of the (US) monster" and well understood its goals.
He was, of course, right, although he didn't live long
enough to see his unfortunate forecast come true. Two years
after José Martí's 1895 death in combat, the US Undersecretary
of State, referring to Cuba, commented that "our policy must
always be to support the weaker against the stronger, until we
have obtained the extermination of them both, in order to
annex the Pearl of the Antilles." The Treaty of Paris ending
the Spanish-American War excluded Cuban representatives and
treated the island as a spoil of war.
The Dominican fighter for Cuban independence, General Máximo
Gómez, wrote that "The Americans' military occupation is too
high a price to pay for their spontaneous intervention in the
war we waged against Spain for freedom and independence. The
American government's attitude toward the heroic Cuban people
at this history making time is, in my opinion, one of big
business ...This transitional government was imposed by force
by a foreign power and, therefore, is illegitimate and
incompatible with the principles that the entire country has
been upholding for so long and in the defense of which its
sons have given their lives and all of its wealth has been
consumed."
One hundred and two years ago, on 2 March 1901, the US
Congress forced the Platt Amendment onto the Cuban
Constitution effectively turning the island into a US
subcolony by legalizing US military intervention at will and
seizing a large part of Cuban territory to turn into a naval
base. As Cuban patriot Juan Gualberto Gómez said: "The
Amendment was like giving it the key to our house so it could
come and go at all hours."
Although the Platt Amendment was abrogated in 1934 the
United States still maintains its base in Guantánamo Bay which
is now mostly used as an extra-territorial prison to bypass US
penal legislation and still represents a blatant violation of
Cuban sovereignty.